I recently published a commentary on how certain basic ideas about how to organize the Objectivist movement that were formulated in the 1980s have begun to fall away, implicitly rejected even by those who used to advocate them. Of those ideas, the only one on which I have seen any real debate is the question about whether Objectivism is a "closed" or an "open" system, that is, whether you can add a new idea to the philosophy and still call it "Objectivism."
Crucial New Ideas That Are Not Hers
Crucial New Ideas That Are Not Hers
Crucial New Ideas That Are Not Hers
I recently published a commentary on how certain basic ideas about how to organize the Objectivist movement that were formulated in the 1980s have begun to fall away, implicitly rejected even by those who used to advocate them. Of those ideas, the only one on which I have seen any real debate is the question about whether Objectivism is a "closed" or an "open" system, that is, whether you can add a new idea to the philosophy and still call it "Objectivism."