If we have such an overwhelming scientific "consensus" about the supposed threat of catastrophic man-made global warming—and about the political and economic solutions to it—then why do advocates have to sue scientists to prevent them from questioning it?
Scientific Consensus, Courtesy of Lawyers
If we have such an overwhelming scientific "consensus" about the supposed threat of catastrophic man-made global warming—and about the political and economic solutions to it—then why do advocates have to sue scientists to prevent them from questioning it?